data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7c59/f7c5950340edbca0adc8b8efa87c2f794a327cc1" alt="SPR vs BLI vs IRIS"
SPR | BLI | iRiS Kinetics | |
---|---|---|---|
Technology | Surface Plasmon Resonance | Bio-layer Interferometry | Interferometric Reflectance |
Signal | Refractive Index | Wavelength Shift | Multiple Wavelength Shifts |
Observing Side | From opposite side as sample – indirect measurement | From opposite side as sample – indirect measurement | From same side as sample – direct thickness measurement |
Immobilization Technology | Very limited | Limited | Wide range of materials available, including your own |
Multiplex Capabilities | Yes | No | Yes, and arrays of several hundred elements can be used |
Kinetics Data Quality | very dependent on chip selection and operator skills | Relies on diffusion and therefore high MW biomolecular affinities are not so accurate |
Using a 2D immobilization, all binding is kinetics driven in the flow-cell, yielding highly relevant numbers |
Sample Compatibility |
Less tolerant of samples containing high levels of solvent |
Less tolerant of samples containing high levels of solvent |
Wide range of compatibilities, including no bulk effect with DMSO containing samples |
Costs per data point | High | Med | Low |
Operator training requirements | High | Med | Low |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e55b1/e55b16e3dbdef568ce7a5e5615f7713a80f20e6a" alt="SPRvsBLIvsIRIS technical Advantages over SPR and BLI"